4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Linomide in relapsing and secondary progressive MS - Part I: Trial design and clinical results

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 9, Pages 1726-1733

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.54.9.1726

Keywords

linomide; MS; randomized controlled trial; clinical outcome measures

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR-02558] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [4318850A] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether linomide (roquinimex) is better than placebo in slowing the time to confirmed clinical worsening in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) MS. Methods: In this 27-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, phase III trial, 715 patients with active RRMS (n = 90) or SPMS (n = 625) were randomized to receive either linomide (1.0, 2.5, or 7.5 mg orally daily) or placebo. Patients were evaluated at 3-month intervals clinically and with MRI. The planned primary outcome was the time to the development of confirmed clinical worsening (increase of greater than or equal to 1.0 Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score for an enrollment EDSS score greater than or equal to 5.0, or greater than or equal to 0.5 point for an enrollment EDSS score of greater than or equal to 5.5) not associated with an acute relapse. Results: The trial was terminated 1 month after it became fully enrolled due to unanticipated serious cardiopulmonary toxicities (pericarditis, pleural effusion, myocardial infarction, and possible pulmonary embolism), pancreatitis, and death. Notable arthralgia, myalgia, bursitis, and facial and peripheral edema were common adverse events. The high dose of linomide (7.5 mg) was not well tolerated. The trial was too brief to determine unequivocal clinical benefits. Trends suggested an unconfirmed early effect on change in EDSS score at 6 months for the medium dose (2.5 mg daily). Conclusion: MS patients may be more prone to develop important linomide treatment-related adverse events than other previously studied patients. However, linomide may be a potentially more toxic drug than was suspected from observations made in smaller studies for other indications. Phase III trials may identify infrequent and important toxicities that may plot be anticipated by phase I and II trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available