4.6 Article

Classical and nonclassical class I major histocompatibility complex molecules exhibit subtle conformational differences that affect binding to CD8αα

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 275, Issue 20, Pages 15232-15238

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.20.15232

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cell surface molecules CD4 and CD8 greatly enhance the sensitivity of T-cell antigen recognition, acting as co-receptors by binding to the same major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules as the T-cell receptor (TCR), Here we use surface plasmon resonance to study the binding of CD8 alpha alpha to class I MHC molecules. CD8 alpha alpha bound the classical MHC molecules HLA-A*0201, -A*1101, -B*3501, and -C*0702 with dissociation constants (K-d) of 90-220 mu M, a range of affinities distinctly lower than that of TCR/peptide-MHC interaction. We suggest such affinities apply to most CD8 alpha alpha/classical class I MHC interactions and may be optimal for T-cell recognition. In contrast, CD8 alpha alpha bound both HLA-A*6801 and B*4801 with a significantly lower affinity (greater than or equal to 1 mM), consistent with the finding that interactions with these alleles are unable to mediate cell-cell adhesion. Interestingly, CD8 alpha alpha bound normally to the nonclassical MHC molecule HLA-G (K-d similar to 150 mu M), but only weakly to the natural killer cell receptor ligand HLA-E (K-d greater than or equal to 1 mM). Site-directed mutagenesis experiments revealed that variation in CD8 alpha alpha binding affinity can be explained by amino acid differences within the alpha 3 domain. Taken together with crystallographic studies, these results indicate that subtle conformational changes in the solvent exposed alpha 3 domain loop (residues 223-229) can account for the differential ability of both classical and nonclassical class I MHC molecules to bind CD8.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available