4.8 Article

Cerebral metabolic and cognitive decline in persons at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.090106797

Keywords

apolipoprotein E; positron emission tomography; cerebral glucose metabolism; age-associated memory impairment

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000865] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P50 AG005128, AG13308, P50 AG016570, P30 AG010123, U24 AG021886, P60 AG011268, R01 AG013308] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH052453, MH52453] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS031153, P01 NS026630] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The major known genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD), apolipoprotein E-4 (APOE-4), is associated with lowered parietal, temporal, and posterior cingulate cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD. To determine cognitive and metabolic decline patterns according to genetic risk, we investigated cerebral metabolic rates by using positron emission tomography in middle-aged and older nondemented persons with normal memory performance. A single copy of the APOE-4 allele was associated with lowered inferior parietal, lateral temporal, and posterior cingulate metabolism, which predicted cognitive decline after 2 years of longitudinal follow-up. For the 20 nondemented subjects followed longitudinally, memory performance scores did not decline significantly, but cortical metabolic rates did. In APOE-4 carriers, a 4% left posterior cingulate metabolic decline was observed, and inferior parietal and lateral temporal regions demonstrated the greatest magnitude (5%) of metabolic decline after 2 years. These results indicate that the combination of cerebral metabolic: rates and genetic risk factors provides a means for preclinical AD detection that will assist in response monitoring during experimental treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available