4.5 Article

Lim homeobox gene, Lhx8, is essential for mouse oocyte differentiation and survival

Journal

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
Volume 79, Issue 3, Pages 442-449

Publisher

SOC STUDY REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.069393

Keywords

developmental biology; gamete biology; gene regulation; KIT; KITL; meiosis; LHX8; NOBOX; oocyte development; oogenesis; ovary; primordial follicle

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD044858, HD44858] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lhx8 is a member of the LIM-homeobox transcription factor family and preferentially expressed in oocytes and germ cells within the mouse ovary. We discovered that Lhx8 knockout females lose oocytes within 7 days after birth. At the time of birth, histological examination shows that Lhx8-deficient (Lhx8(-/-)) ovaries are grossly similar to the newborn wild-type ovaries. Lhx8(-/-) ovaries fail to maintain the primordial follicles, and the transition from primordial to growing follicles does not occur. Lhx8(-/-) ovaries misexpress oocyte-specific genes, such as Gdf9, Pou5f1, and Nobox. Very rapid loss of oocytes may partly be due to the drastic downregulation of Kit and Kid in Lhx8(-/-) ovaries. We compared Lhx8(-/-) and wild-type ovaries using an Affymetrix 430 2.0 microarray platform. A total of 80 (44%) of 180 of the genes downregulated more than 5-fold in Lhx8(-/-) ovaries were preferentially expressed in oocytes, whereas only 3 (2%) of 146 genes upregulated more than 5-fold in the absence of Lhx8 were preferentially expressed in oocytes. In addition, the comparison of genes regulated in Lhx8(-/-) and Nobox(-/-) newborn ovaries discovered a common set of 34 genes whose expression level was affected in both Lhx8- and Nobox-deficient mice. Our findings show that Lhx8 is a critical factor for maintenance and differentiation of the oocyte during early oogenesis, and it acts in part by downregulating the Nobox pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available