4.4 Article

Gender differences in sweat lactate

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages 230-235

Publisher

SPRINGER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004210050676

Keywords

eccrine sweat; gender; sweat composition; sweat rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sweat rate may affect sweat lactate concentration. The current study examined potential gender differences in sweat lactate concentrations because of varying sweat rates. Males (n = 6) and females (n = 6) of similar age, percentage body fat, and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) completed constant load (CON) cycling (30 min - approximately 40% VO2max) and interval cycling (INT) (15 1-min intervals each separated by I min of rest) trials at 32 (1) degrees C wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT). Trials were preceded by 15 min of warm-up (0.5 kp, 60 rpms) and followed by 15 min of rest. Blood and sweat samples were collected at 15, 25, 35, 45. and 60 min during each trial. Total body water loss was used to calculate sweat rate. Blood lactate concentrations (CON congruent to 2 mmol . l(-1). INT congruent to 6 mmol . l(-1)) and sweat lactate concentrations (CON and INT congruent to 12 mmol . l(-1)) were not significantly different (P > 0.05) at any time between genders for CON or INT. Overall sweat rates (ml . h(-1)) were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between trials but were significantly greater(P less than or equal to 0.05) for males than for females for CON [779.7 (292.6) versus 450.3 (84.6) ml . h(-1)] and INT [798.0 (268.3) versus 503.0 (41.4) ml h(-1)]. However, correcting for surface area diminished the difference [CON: 390.7 (134.4) versus 277.7 (44.4) ml . h(-1). INT: 401.5 (124.1) versus 310.6 (23.4) ml h(-1) (P less than or equal to 0.07)]. Estimated total lactate secretion was significantly greater(P less than or equal to 0.05) in males for CON and INT. Results suggest that sweat rate differences do not affect sweat lactate concentrations between genders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available