4.2 Article

Combination of the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Score Allows a Better Stratification of High-Risk Patients Undergoing Reduced-Toxicity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 66-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.10.011

Keywords

EBMT score; HCT-CI; Reduced-intensity conditioning stem cell transplantation; Allo-reduced-intensity conditioning; Comorbidity

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain [PI1100872, RD06/0020/0101, RD12/0036/0071, EC07/90065]
  2. Pla Recerca de Catalunya [2009-SGR-168]
  3. Marato TV3 [100830/31/32]
  4. Fundacion Cellex, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to determine whether the integration of the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) score would improve individual capacity for stratification of high-risk HCT candidates. A total of 442 consecutive patients receiving an allogeneic Ha after reduced-toxicity conditioning was included. Final Ha-a and EBMT scores were calculated and validated. Then, patients were grouped into a 6-category new combination model according to the HCT-CI (0, 1 to 2, >= 3) and EBMT scores (0 to 3, 4 to 7), and the model's predictive capacity was also evaluated. Median HCT-CI and EBMT scores were 3 and 4, respectively. Increased HCT-CI was associated with higher 4-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and lower 4-year overall survival (OS), whereas a high EBMT score was associated with higher 4-year NRM. The Ha-a showed a trend for a better predictive capacity than the EBMT score (c-statistic .6 versus .54, P = .1). According to the new model, patients within HCT-CI of 0 and HCT-CI of 1 to 2 groups had similar risk of NRM independently of their EBMT score. Within the HCT-CI >= 3 group, patients with low EBMT score showed lower NRM (25% versus 40%, P = .04) and a trend to higher OS (52% versus 36%, P = .06) than patients with a high EBMT score. Moreover, patients with Ha-a >= 3 and EBMT score 0 to 3 had similar outcomes than those with HCT-CI of 1 to 2. In conclusion, the combination of HCT-CI and the EBMT score is feasible and might contribute to a better identification of high-risk patients, improving selection of best allogeneic HCT candidates. (C) 2014 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available