4.5 Article

Mobilization of vitamin a stores in rats after administration of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin:: A kinetic analysis

Journal

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 478-484

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/55.2.478

Keywords

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; TCDD; rat; vitamin A; model-based compartmental analysis; kinetics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a highly toxic environmental contaminant that prevents the normal accumulation of vitamin A in liver and causes increased excretion of vitamin A, To determine what alterations in vitamin A metabolism occur first in response to TCDD treatment, we administered TCDD (7.0 mu g/kg b.w,) orally to rats that had received a nonperturbing (tracer) iv dose of [H-3]vitamin A-labeled plasma (n = 3) or lymph (n = 3) 21 days earlier. Within a few days after TCDD administration, fraction of the injected radiolabel in plasma, which had been in a terminal slope when plotted on a semilog scale, increased and remained elevated until the experiment was terminated (day 42), At that time, liver vitamin A levels were 65% lower in TCDD-perturbed rats than in controls. Using model-based compartmental analysis and compartmental models developed previously for control rats (S. K. Kelley ef al,, 1998, Toxicol. Sci, 44:1-13), we determined the minimal changes needed to account for the perturbation in plasma [H-3] tracer responses after TCDD administration. We determined that the effects of TCDD could be explained by adjusting the value of one fractional transfer coefficient corresponding to the mobilization of vitamin A from large, slowly turning-over pools. We speculate that this change corresponds to an increased fractional rate of retinyl ester hydrolysis, and that it precedes the TCDD-associated increased irreversible utilization and excretion of vitamin A.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available