4.5 Article

Contrast-enhanced MRI of the lung

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 196-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(00)00199-6

Keywords

MR imaging; lung disease; contrast medium; MR angiography; pulmonary arteries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lung has long been neglected by MR imaging. This is due to unique intrinsic difficulties: (1) signal loss due to cardiac pulsation and respiration: (2) susceptibility artifacts caused by multiple air-tissue interfaces; (3) low proton density. There are many MR strategies to overcome these problems. They consist of breath-hold imaging. respiratory and cardiac gating procedures. use of short repetition and echo rimes, increase of the relaxivity of existing spins by administration of intravenous contrast agents, and enrichment of. spin density by hyperpolarized noble gases or oxygen. Improvements in scanner performance and frequent use of contrast media have increased the interest in MR imaging and MR angiography of the lung. They can be used on a routine basis for the following indications: characterization of pulmonary nodules, staging of bronchogenic carcinoma, in particular :assessment of chest wall invasion. evaluation of inflammatory activity in interstitial lung disease; acute pulmonary embolism, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, vascular involvement in malignant disease; vascular abnormalities. Future perspectives include perfusion imaging using extracellular or intravascular (blood pool) contrast agents and ventilation imaging using inhalation of hyperpolarized noble gases, of paramagnetic oxygen or of aerosolized contrast agents. These techniques represent new approaches to functional lung imaging. The combination of visualization of morphology and functional assessment of ventilation and perfusion is unequalled by any other technique. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. AII rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available