4.7 Article

Gravitational collapse in turbulent molecular clouds. I. Gasdynamical turbulence

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 535, Issue 2, Pages 887-906

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/308891

Keywords

hydrodynamics; ISM : clouds; ISM : kinematics and dynamics; stars : formation; turbulence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observed molecular clouds often appear to have very low star formation efficiencies and lifetimes an order of magnitude longer than their free-fall times. Their support is attributed to the random supersonic motions observed in them. We study the support of molecular clouds against gravitational collapse by supersonic, gasdynamical turbulence using direct numerical simulation. Computations with two different algorithms are compared: a particle-based, Lagrangian method (smoothed particle hydrodynamics [SPH]) and a grid-based, Eulerian, second-order method (ZEUS). The effects of both algorithm and resolution can be studied with this method. We find that, under typical molecular cloud conditions, global collapse can indeed be prevented, but density enhancements caused by strong shocks nevertheless become gravitationally unstable and collapse into dense cores and, presumably, stars. The occurrence and efficiency of local collapse decreases as the driving wavelength decreases and the driving strength increases. It appears that local collapse can be prevented entirely only with unrealistically short wavelength driving, but observed core formation rates can be reproduced with more realistic driving. At high collapse rates, cores are formed on short timescales in coherent structures with high efficiency, while at low collapse rates they are scattered randomly throughout the region and exhibit considerable age spread. We suggest that this naturally explains the observed distinction between isolated and clustered star formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available