4.7 Article

Subcutaneous administration of amifostine during fractionated radiotherapy: A randomized phase II study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 2226-2233

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.11.2226

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Amifostine (WR-2721) is an impotant cytoprotective agent. Although intravenous administration is the standard route, pharmacokinetic studies have shown acceptable plasma levels of the active metabolite of amifostine (WR-1605) after subcutaneous administration, The subcutaneous route, due to ifs simplicity, presents multiple advantages over the intravenous route when amifostine is used during fractionated radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients with thoracic, 40 with head and neck, and 40 wish pelvic tumors who were undergoing radical radiotherapy were enrolled onto ct randomized phase II trial to assess the feasibility, tolerance, and cytoprotective efficacy of amifostine administered subcutaneously, A flat dose of amifostine 500 mg, diluted in 2.5 mL of normal saline, was injected subcutaneously 20 minutes before each radiotherapy fraction. Results: The subcutaneous amifostine regimen wets well tolerated by 85% of patients. In approximately 5% of patients, amifostine therapy was interrupted due to cumulative asthenia, and in 10%, due to a fever/rash reaction. Hypotension was never noted, whereas nausea was frequent. A significant reduction of pharyngeal, esophageal, and rectal mucositis was noted in the amifostine arm (P < .04). The delays in radiotherapy because of grade 3 mucositis were significantly longer in the group of patients treated with radiotherapy alone (P < .04). Amifostine significantly reduced the incidence of acute perineal skin and bladder toxicity (P < .0006). Conclusion: Subcutaneous administration of amifostine is well tolerated, effectively reduces radiotherapy's early toxicity, and prevents delays in radiotherapy. The subcutaneous route is much simpler and saves time compared with the intravenous route of administration and can be safely and effectively applied in the daily, busy radiotherapy practice. J Clin Oncol 18:2226-2233. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available