4.6 Article

Brassica vegetables increase and apiaceous vegetables decrease cytochrome P450 1A2 activity in humans: changes in caffeine metabolite ratios in response to controlled vegetable diets

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1157-1162

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/21.6.1157

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA70913] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Induction or inhibition of biotransformation enzymes, enzymes that activate or detoxify numerous xenobiotics, is one mechanism by which vegetables may alter cancer risk, Using a randomized crossover design, we examined the effect of various vegetable diets on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) and xanthine oxidase activity in humans. Men and women, non-smokers, on no medication and 20-40 years of age ate four 6-day controlled diets: basal (vegetable-free) and basal with three botanically defined vegetable groups. Enzyme activities were determined by measuring urinary caffeine metabolite ratios after a 200 mg caffeine dose on the last day of each feeding period. Mean CYP1A2 activity for 19 men and 17 women (least squares means adjusted for sex, GSTM1 genotype, urine volume and feeding period) with basal, brassica, allium and apiaceous vegetable diets differed significantly (P less than or equal to 0.0005) by diet, irrespective of the caffeine metabolite molar ratio used to describe CYP1A2 activity; brassica vegetables increased (P < 0.04) and apiaceous vegetables decreased (P less than or equal to 0.02) activity compared with the basal and allium diets. There was no effect of diet on NAT2 and xanthine oxidase activities and none of the subjects differed by GSTM1 genotype. These results demonstrate that while one vegetable subgroup induces human CYP1A2 activity, another subgroup inhibits it. This points to a complex association between consumption of a typical diet of various vegetables and biotransformation enzyme activities in humans, an association that may be difficult to interpret in observational studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available