4.7 Article

Relationship of Mu opioid receptor binding to activation of G-proteins in specific rat brain regions

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 11, Pages 1395-1401

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-2952(00)00272-0

Keywords

mu opioid; G-protein; agonist efficacy; [S-35]GTP gamma S; naloxone; signal transduction

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA-02904, DA-07625, DA-06634] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the relationship between mu receptor binding and mu agonist activation of G-proteins in the rat brain. To directly compare agonist potencies in receptor binding (K-i values) and G-protein activation (K-s values), both agonist-stimulated [S-35]guanosine-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphat ([S-35]GTP gamma S) and [H-3]naloxone binding assays were conducted under identical conditions, using the full mu agonist [d-Ala(2), N-Me-4, Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO). DAMGO exhibited biphasic competition of [H-3]naloxone binding and stimulation of [S-35]GTP gamma S binding in most regions. Whereas the high affinity component represented a large percentage (50-80%) of total receptor sites, the high-affinity component of DAMGO-stimulated [S-35]GTP gamma S binding was much lower, <30% of the total, and in most regions significant stimulation of [S-35]GTP gamma S binding did not occur until the high-affinity binding sites were completely occupied. Moreover, the low-affinity potencies for DAMGO in receptor binding and G-protein activation were the same across different regions. Receptor-transducer amplification factors were calculated by the ratio of the apparent B-max of net agonist-stimulated [S-35]GTP gamma S binding to the B-max of receptor binding. Amplification factors for the nine regions examined were relatively high and varied significantly across regions, from a ratio of 8 in the thalamus to 38 in the cortex, suggesting that the efficiency of mu opioid receptor coupling to G-proteins varies across brain regions. BIOCHEM PHARMACOL 59;11:1395-1401, 2000. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available