4.6 Article

Role of aquatic vegetation coverage on hypoxia and sunfish abundance in bays of a eutrophic reservoir

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 427, Issue 1-3, Pages 51-57

Publisher

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1003999929094

Keywords

aquatic vegetation; foraging efficiency; predation; dissolved oxygen; sunfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the relation between aquatic vegetation coverage, summer dissolved oxygen and density of sunfishes (Lepomis spp.) in 10 shallow bays of a eutrophic reservoir. The bays ranged 5.2-15.7 ha in area, 0.6-1.3 m mean depth and 6-91% vegetation area coverage. Over the 10 bays mean dissolved oxygen concentration ranged 5.8-9.0 mg 1(-1) in open water at least 20 m away from the vegetation, 0.8-8.1 mg 1(-1) at the vegetation-water edge and 0.5-7.7 mg 1(-1) in dense vegetation. Dissolved oxygen concentrations were inversely related to vegetation coverage. In open water, dissolved oxygen levels were consistently higher than 8 mg 1(-1) when vegetation coverage was <20% of the bay and decreased to about 6 mg 1(-1) at coverages near 80%. At the vegetation-water edge and within dense vegetation, dissolved oxygen levels dropped rapidly as vegetation coverage increased to 20% of the bay; when vegetation reached about 50% coverage, dissolved oxygen remained near 1.5 mg 1(-1) at the vegetation-water edge, but oxygen dropped below 1 mg 1(-1) in dense vegetation. Scarce vegetation harbored high Lepomis relative abundance (fish per m(2) of vegetation) whereas extensive vegetation harbored low relative abundance, both contributing little to absolute abundance (total fish in all vegetation); however, intermediate coverage offered a combination of mid-level fish relative abundance that together with mid-level plant coverage translated into high absolute fish abundance. We suggest this response is related to hypoxia, and where aquatic vegetation is extensive, the effect of vegetation on hypoxia and water quality in general may influence fish populations in a way similar to that often attributed to reduced foraging efficiency and increased competitive interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available