4.6 Article

1-4 micron spectrophotometry of dust in the Taurus dark cloud: Water ice distribution in Heiles Cloud 2

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages 603-613

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/313387

Keywords

dust, extinction; infrared : ISM : lines and bands; ISM : individual (Taurus Molecular Cloud); ISM : molecules

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have conducted near infrared spectroscopy of 61 background stars toward Heiles Cloud 2 in the Taurus molecular cloud complex. We used a low-dispersion spectrometer, PASP2, which can simultaneously obtain the spectrum with a wavelength coverage between 1.3 and 4.2 mu m. For 56 of 61 objects, the visual extinction (A(V)) and the optical depth of water ice at lambda = 3.1 mu m (tau(ICE)) have been estimated: for 50 of 56 objects, these were systematically estimated from our data only. In order to investigate the water ice distribution in Heiles Cloud 2, we have constructed a water ice map in which tau(ICE), is plotted at the position of each object. The water ice map is then compared with the (CO)-O-18 (J = 1-0) Map obtained by millimeter observations performed by Sunada & Kitamura. We find that the distribution of water ice is closely correlated with that of (CO)-O-18. Strong water ice absorption is seen only toward the dense (CO)-O-18 clumps, while less water ice absorption is detected toward the outer region of the cloud. There is an A(V) threshold for the positive ice detection (A(V0)), as suggested by previous observations, but with a significant scatter; A(V0) = 2-5 mag. The scatter might be caused by the different contribution of the inner water-containing portion of the cloud along the line of sight. The value of tau(ICE) increases with increasing of A(V) and the slope of Delta tau(ICE)/Delta A(V) is 0.067, consistent with the previously observed values for the Taurus molecular cloud.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available