4.2 Article

Feasibility of Reduced-Intensity Cord Blood Transplantation as Salvage Therapy for Graft Failure: Results of a Nationwide Survey of Adult Patients

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 841-851

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.09.005

Keywords

Graft failure; Rejection; Reduced intensity; Allogeneic stem cell transplantation; Cord blood transplantation

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591415] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate whether rescue with cord blood transplantation (CBT) could improve the poor survival after graft failure (GF), we surveyed the data of 80 adult patients (median age, 51 years) who received CBT within 3 months of GF (primary 64, secondary 16), with fludarabine-based reduced-intensity regimens with or without melphalan, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and/or 2-4 Gy total-body irradiation (TBI). A median number of 2.4 x 10(7)/kg total nucleated cells (TNC) were infused, and among the 61 evaluable patients who survived for more than 28 days, 45 (74%) engrafted. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 325 days, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 33% despite poor performance status (2-4, 60%), carryover organ toxicities (grade 3/4, 14%), and infections (82%) prior to CBT. Day 100 transplantation-related mortality was 45%, with 60% related to infectious complications. Multivariate analysis showed that the infusion of TNC >= 2.5 x 10(7)/kg and an alkylating agent-containing regimen were associated with a higher probability of engraftment, and that high risk-status at the preceding transplantation and grade 3/4 organ toxicities before CBT were associated with an increased risk of mortality. In conclusion, in an older population of patients, our data support the feasibility of CBT with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for GE Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 17: 341-851 (2011) (C) 2011 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available