4.7 Article

Vitamin C and hyperglycemia in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer - Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) study - A population-based study

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 726-732

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.6.726

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To examine the cross-sectional association between plasma vitamin C, self-reported diabetes, and HbA(1c). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Data from a population-based study of diet, cancer, and chronic disease were analyzed. A total of 2,898 men and 3,560 women 45-74 years of age who were registered with general practices in Norfolk, U.K., were recruited to the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer-Norfolk study between 1995 and 1998. RESULTS- Mean plasma vitamin C levels were significantly higher in individuals with HbA(1c) levels <7% than in those with self-reported diabetes or prevalent undiagnosed hyperglycemia (HbA(1c) greater than or equal to 7%). An inverse gradient of mean plasma vitamin C was found in both sexes across quintiles of HbA(1c) distribution <7%. The odds ratio (95% CI) of having prevalent undiagnosed hyperglycemia per 20 mu mol/l (or 1 SD) increase in plasma vitamin C was 0.70 (0.52-0.95) (adjusted for sex, age, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, tertiary education, any use of dietary supplements, vegetarian diet, alcohol consumption, physical activity, dietary vitamin E, dietary fiber, dietary saturated Fat, and smoking history). The unadjusted change in HbA(1c) per 20 mu mol/l increase in vitamin C estimated by linear regression was - 0.12% (- 0.14 to - 0.09) in men and -0.09% (-0.11 to -0.07) in women. After adjusting for the possible confounders, these values were - 0.08% (- 0.11 to -0.04) in men and -0.05% (-0.07 to -0.03) in women. CONCLUSIONS - An inverse association was found between plasma vitamin C and HbA(1c). Dietary measures to increase plasma vitamin C may be an important public health strategy for reducing the prevalence of diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available