4.7 Article

Carbon inputs of the Rhone River to the Mediterranean Sea:: Biogeochemical implications

Journal

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 669-681

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/1999GB900069

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the damming of the Nile, the Rhone River is the main freshwater and sediment supplier to the Mediterranean Sea. We estimated for the period 1987-1996, the dissolved and particulate organic carbon (DOC and POC), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and total suspended matter (TSM) fluxes of the Rhone River to the Mediterranean Sea to be 1.1 +/- 0.2, 1.6 +/- 0.5, 16.2 +/- 0.3 x 10(10) moles C yr(-1), and 9.9 +/- 6.4 x 10(6) t yr(-1), respectively. PIC flux was estimated to be 8.2 +/- 5.4 x 10(9) moles C yr(-1). On the basis of literature data, we estimated that nearshore bacterial respiration of Rhone derived labile-POC and -DOC (LPOC and LDOC) might produce in a few days similar to 0.21 and 0.12 x 10(10) moles CO(2) yr(-1), respectively. Extended to the whole Mediterranean, this study suggests that bacterial respiration of labile organic carbon derived from Mediterranean rivers might rapidly (days) produce 2.6-11 x 10(10) moles CO(2) yr(-1). On the continental shelf, up to 4.7 x 10(10) moles of organic carbon introduced by primary production and Rhone export would escape each year to sedimentation and bacterial mineralization and would be exported off the shelf. Moreover, as total carbon fixed by phytoplankton exceeds (+ 5.2 x 10(10) moles C yr(-1)) the CO(2) produced by bacterial respiration ton average), the biological system on the shelf, could be considered as an autotrophic system and then a sink for atmospheric CO(2). However, these numbers need further examination because of the large uncertainties associated currently to the bacterial growth efficiency values (+ 100%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available