4.2 Article

Impairment of Filgrastim-Induced Stem Cell Mobilization after Prior Lenalidomide in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 718-723

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.02.011

Keywords

Stem cell mobilization; Autotransplant; Myeloma

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016672] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lenalidomide is an agent that has shown great activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, studies have suggested that this drug negatively affects subsequent stem cell collection. To investigate whether lenalidomide impairs stem cell mobilization and collection, we reviewed data for patients with MM who underwent mobilization with filgrastim. Predictors of mobilization failure were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. In 26 (9%) of 302 myeloma patients, stem cell mobilization failed. Mobilization failed in 25% of patients who had previously received lenalidomide, compared with 4% of patients who had not received lenalidomide (P<.001). In a multivariate analysis, prior lenalidomide use (odds ratio: 5.9; 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 2.4-14.3) and mobilization more than I year after diagnosis (odds ratio: 4.6; 95% CI: 1.9-11.1) were significantly associated with failed mobilization. Twenty-one of 26 patients in whom mobilization with filgrastim failed underwent remobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim; in 18 (86%) of these 21 patients, stem cells were successfully mobilized and collected. In patients with multiple myeloma, prior lenalidomide therapy is associated with failure of stem cell mobilization with filgrastim. Remobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim is usually successful in these patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15: 718-723 (2009) (C) 2009 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available