3.8 Article

An integrated biomechanical analysis of high speed incline and level treadmill running

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 1146-1155

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200006000-00018

Keywords

coordination; biarticular muscles; EMG; kinetics; incline running; treadmill running; kinematics; sprint running; sprint training

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Recent sprint training regimens have used high-speed incline treadmill running to provide enhanced loading of muscles responsible fur increasing forward running speed. The goal of this study was to document the joint kinematics, EMG, and swing-phase kinetics of incline treadmill running at 4.5 m . s(-1) with a 30% grade, and compare these data to that of level running under similar conditions. Methods: Sagittal plane video (200 Hz) and EMG from eight lower extremity muscles were recorded during each of three locomotion conditions: incline running at 4.5 m . s(-1) and 30% grade (INC), level running at 4.5 m . s(-1) (LSS), and level running at the same stride frequency as INC (LSSF). A rigid body model was used to estimate net muscle power and work values at the hip, knee, and ankle during swing. Timing and amplitude of EMG signals for each muscle relative to footstrike were compared between conditions. Results: Stride frequency and percentage of stride spent in stance were significantly higher during INC (1.78 Hz; 32.8%) than in the LSS (1.39 Hz; 28.8%) condition. Stride frequency played an important role, as most measures were more similar between INC and LSSF. Extensor range of motion of all joints during push-off was higher for INC. During INC, average EMG amplitude of the gastrocnemius, soleus, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, and gluteus maximus were higher during stance, whereas the hamstrings activity amplitudes were lower. Average power and energy generated during hip flexion and extension in the swing phase were greatest during INC. Conclusions: These data suggest that compared with LSSF and LSS, INC provides enhanced muscular loading of key mono- and bi-articular muscles during both swing and stance phases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available