4.7 Article

Reduced phosphodiesters and high-energy phosphates in the frontal lobe of schizophrenic patients:: A 31P chemical shift spectroscopic-imaging study

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 954-961

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00235-3

Keywords

schizophrenia; (31)phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy; chemical shift imaging; phospholipid membrane hypothesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: (31)Phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been widely used to evaluate schizophrenic patients in comparison to control subjects, because it allows the investigation of both phospholipid and energy metabolism in vivo; however, the results achieved so far are inconsistent. Chemical shift imaging (CSI) has the advantage that instead of only one or a few preselected voxels the tissue of a whole brain slice can be examined. The aim of the present investigation was to determine whether the results of previous studies of our group, showing that phosphodiesters (PDE) are decreased in the frontal lobe of schizophrenic patients as compared to control subjects, might De confirmed in art independent unmedicated patient sample using the CSI technique. Methods: A carefully selected new cohort including 11 neuroleptic-free schizophrenic patients and 11 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects was recruited. CSI was applied and an innovative analysis method for CSI data based on a general linear model was used. Results: PDE, phosphocreatine, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) were found to be significantly decreased in the frontal lobe of patients with schizophrenia. Conclusions: Because PDE was decreased in schizophrenic patients, the membrane phospholipid hypothesis of schizophrenia could not be corroborated. Further results indicate decreased ATP production in the frontal lobe of patients with schizophrenia. (C) 2000 Society of Biological Psychiatry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available