4.2 Article

Neuropotency of human mesenchymal stem cell cultures: Clonal studies reveal the contribution of cell plasticity and cell contamination

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 546-555

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.02.017

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cells; multipotent stromal cells; neuropotency; pluripotency; transdifferentiation; neural cell plasticity; neural cell contamination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various studies have shown neuropotency of bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) based on the appearance of cells with neural phenotype before or after neural induction protocols. However, to date, it is unclear which mechanisms account for this observation. We hypothesized that neural phenotypes observed in hMSC cultures can be because of both intrinsic cell plasticity and contamination by cells of neural origin. Therefore, we characterized 38 clones from hMSC cultures by assessing their adipogenic/osteogenic potential with specific mesenchymal differentiation protocols, and their molecular neural phenotype by RTPCR analysis before and after exposure to a defined neural stem cell (NSC) medium for 8 days (neural protocol). We found 33 clones with mesenchymal potential and 15 of them also showed a neural phenotype. As neural phenotypes were maintained during the neural protocol, this suggested neural cell plasticity in 39% of all clones through pluripotency. Importantly, we were able to induce neural phenotypes in 11 of mesenchymal clones applying the neural protocol, demonstrating neural cell plasticity in 29% of all clones through the mechanism of transdifferentiation. Finally, 2 of 5 nonmesenchymal clones (5% of all clones) displayed a neural phenotype indicating neural cell contamination of hMSC cultures. In conclusion, we found 2 different ways of neuropotency of hMSC cultures: cell plasticity and cell contamination. (C) 2008 American Sociery for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available