4.2 Article

Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation from unrelated donors:: Evaluation of mycophenolate mofetil plus cyclosporin a as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 664-671

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.007

Keywords

unrelated donor; allogeneic transplantation; reduced-intensity conditioning; mycophenolate mofetil; graft-versus-host disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current study, we have analyzed the efficacy of cyclosporine A (CSA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in the fludarabine plus melphalan or busulfan reduced intensity regimen (RIC) setting in a series of 44 patients receiving allogeneic transplantation from an unrelated donor. Only 23% were in the first complete remission at the time of transplant. Cumulative incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 53% and 23%, respectively. Fifty-six percent had equal to or greater than grade 2 gut involvement. Cumulative incidence of overall and extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 93% and 63%, respectively. Ninety-two percent of patients who were evaluable + 100 days after transplant were in complete remission. Relapse rate was 25% at 2 years. Event free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 52%. Pharmacokinetic assays of mycophenolic acid (MPA) showed a therapeutic area under the curve (AUC) at the dosage of 3 g daily, although a large inter- and intraindividual variations of MPA plasma levels were found. In conclusion, the combination of CSA plus MW in the fludarabine plus melphalan or busulfan RIC setting is feasible. Regarding GVHD, this combination allowed to control aGVHD but lead to a high incidence of cGVHD, so that newer strategies are required, especially in trying to decrease gastrointestinal involvement. 2008 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available