4.7 Article

Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 299, Issue 2, Pages 283-293

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3732

Keywords

co-evolution; protein interaction; ligand binding; G-protein coupled receptors; chemokines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The divergent evolution of proteins in cellular signaling pathways requires ligands and their receptors to co-evolve, creating new pathways when a new receptor is activated by a new Ligand. However, information about the evolution of binding specificity in Ligand-receptor systems is difficult to glean from sequences alone. We have used phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), an enzyme that forms its active site between its two domains, to develop a standard for measuring the co-evolution of interacting proteins. The N-terminal and C-terminal domains of PGK form the active site at their interface and are covalently linked. Therefore, they must have co-evolved to preserve enzyme function. By building two phylogenetic trees from multiple sequence alignments of each of the two domains of PGK, we have calculated a correlation coefficient for the two trees that quantifies the coevolution of the two domains. The correlation coefficient for the trees of the two domains of PGK is 0.79, which establishes an upper bound for the co-evolution of a protein domain with its binding partner. The analysis is extended to ligands and their receptors, using the chemokines as a model. We show that the correlation between the chemokine ligand and receptor trees' distances is 0.57. The chemokine family of protein ligands and their G-protein coupled receptors have coevolved so that each subgroup of chemokine Ligands has a matching subgroup of chemokine receptors. The matching subfamilies of Ligands and their receptors create a framework within which the ligands of orphan chemokine receptors can be more easily determined. This approach can be applied to a variety of Ligand and receptor systems. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available