4.8 Article

α-NaYb(Mn)F4:Er3+/Tm3+@NaYF4 UCNPs as Band-Shape Luminescent Nanothermometers over a Wide Temperature Range

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 7, Issue 37, Pages 20813-20819

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b05876

Keywords

lanthanide; luminescent nanothermometer; upconversion nanoparticles; thermally coupled; band-shape; sensitivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21371165, 51372242, 21221061, 91122030, 21210001]
  2. Science and Technology Cooperation Special Project of Hong Kong [2014DFT10310]
  3. Science and Technology Cooperation Special Project of Macao [2014DFT10310]
  4. Science and Technology Cooperation Special Project of Taiwan [2014DFT10310]
  5. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB643802]
  6. Jilin Province Youth Foundation [20130522122JH]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel flower-like alpha-NaYb(Mn)F-4:Er3+/Tm3+@NaYF4 upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) as luminescent nanothermometers have been developed by combining liquid-solid solution hydrothermal strategy with thermal decomposition strategy. Under 980 nm excitation, they exhibit intense upconversion luminescence and temperature-dependent upconversion luminescence over a wide temperature range. The influence of temperature on band-shape upconversion luminescence (UCL) spectra and the intensity of emission bands are analyzed and discussed in detail. We further successfully test and verify that intensity ratios RE, of H-2(11/2) -> I-4(15/2) and S-4(3/2) -> I-4(15/2) and R-Tm of (1)G(4) -> H-3(5) and H-3(4) -> H-3(6) are sensitive to temperature, and the population of active ions follows Boltzmann-type population distribution very well. These luminescent nanothermometers could be applied over a wide temperature range from 123 to 423 K with high sensitivity, which enable them to be excellent candidates for temperature sensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available