4.0 Article

Critical role of enhanced CD4 affinity in laboratory adaptation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Journal

AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 871-882

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PUBL
DOI: 10.1089/08892220050042819

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [2 RO1 CA67358] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [I F32 AI09735] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that use the coreceptor CXCR4 (X4 strains) become laboratory adapted (LA) when selected for ability to replicate in leukemic T cell lines such as H9, Compared with patient X4 viruses, the gp120-gp41 complexes of LA viruses have a constellation of common properties including enhanced affinities for CD4, greater sensitivities to inactivations by diverse antibodies and by soluble CD4, increased shedding of gp120, and improved abilities to infect HeLa-CD4 cell clones that contain only trace quantities of CD4, These common characteristics, which may result from a concerted structural rearrangement of the gp120-gp41 complexes, have made it difficult to identify a specific feature that is critical for laboratory adaptation, To test the hypothesis that replication of patient X4 HIV-1 is limited by the low CD4 concentration in H9 cells (7.0 x 10(3) CD4/cell), we constructed H9 derivatives that express at least 10 times more of this receptor, Interestingly, most patient X4 isolates readily grew in these derivative cells, and the resulting virus preparations retained the characteristics of primary viruses throughout multiple passages, In contrast, selection of the same viruses in the parental H9 cells resulted in outgrowth of LA derivatives, We conclude that a weak interaction of patient X4 HIV-1 isolates with CD4 is the primary factor that limits their replication in leukemic T cell lines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available