4.7 Article

Wind interaction models for gamma-ray burst afterglows: The case for two types of progenitors

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 536, Issue 1, Pages 195-212

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/308914

Keywords

gamma rays : bursts; stars : mass loss; supernovae : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beginning with the gamma-ray bursts GRB 970228 and GRB 970508, a standard model for the interpretation of gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows emerged involving synchrotron emission from a constant-energy blast wave expanding into a constant-density, interstellar medium. However, a massive star origin for GRBs implies a stellar wind environment, probably a Wolf-Rayet star, and we have previously suggested wind interaction models for the afterglows of GRBs 980326, 980519, and 980425/SN 1998bw. Here, we extend the theory of afterglows in winds, considering strong cooling phases, the transition to nonrelativistic motion, jets, and prompt reverse-shock emission. We find that, compared to the interstellar case, the optical prompt emission in the wind case could have a comparable magnitude but would die off faster. We examine the afterglows of other well-observed GRBs in the context of wind interaction models and find that GRBs 970228 and 970508 are likely wind interactors. The revision in the nonthermal afterglow emission from GRB 970228 caused by the recognition of late supernova emission favors wind interaction. The radio evolution of GRB 970508 provides especially strong evidence for wind interaction. For GRB 970508, the observations suggest a density that is compatible with that expected in a Wolf-Rayet star wind. Finally, observations of the afterglow evolution of GRBs 990123 and 990510 and the prompt optical emission from GRB 990123 favor interstellar interaction models, which would suggest compact star merger progenitors for these objects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available