4.5 Article

Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading

Journal

SPINE
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1477-1482

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200006150-00005

Keywords

apoptosis; biomechanics; intervertebral disc; spine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Design. An in vivo study of the toxic consequences of static compressive stress on the intervertebral disc. Objectives. To determine whether disc cell death is correlated with the magnitude and duration of spinal compressive loading. Summary of Background Data. Static compression in vivo has been demonstrated to induce cell death. Cell death, in turn, has been associated with disc degeneration humans. There are currently no tolerance criteria for the intervertebral disc that combine both biomechanical and biologic factors, although both have been implicated in cases of accelerated degeneration. Methods. Mouse tail discs were loaded in vivo with an external compression device. Compressive stress was applied at one of two magnitudes (0.4 acid 0.8 MPa) for 7 days, and at one additional magnitude (1.3 MPa) for 1, 3, and 7 days. Midsagittal sections of the discs were stained for apoptosis using the TdT-dUTP terminal nick-end labeling (TUNEL) reaction. Quantal analysis was used to correlate the extent of cell death to the magnitude and duration of loading. Results: The probit transformation of the percentage of dying cells was proportional to the sum of the logarithmic transformations of the compressive stress and the time of loading. Conclusions. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of developing a quantitative correlation between spinal loading and disc degeneration. Such a correlation may be coupled in the future to existing engineering models that predict spinal loading in response to physical exposures and lead to improved definition of the bounds of healthy and unhealthy spinal loading, and uitimately, refined guidelines for low back safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available