4.7 Article

Radio galaxies with a 'double-double' morphology -: II.: The evolution of double-double radio galaxies and implications for the alignment effect in FRII sources

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 315, Issue 2, Pages 381-394

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03431.x

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : jets; intergalactic medium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A double-double radio galaxy (DDRG) is defined as consisting of a pair of double radio sources with a common centre. In this paper we present an analytical model in which the peculiar radio structure of DDRGs is caused by an interruption of the jet flow in the central AGN. The new jets emerging from the restarted AGN give rise to an inner source structure within the region of the old, outer cocoon. Standard models of the evolution of FRII sources predict gas densities within the region of the old cocoon that are insufficient to explain the observed properties of the inner source structure. Therefore additional material must have passed from the environment of the source through the bow shock surrounding the outer source structure into the cocoon. We propose that this material is warm clouds (similar to 10(4) K) of gas embedded in the hot IGM which are eventually dispersed over the cocoon volume by surface instabilities induced by the passage of cocoon material. The derived lower limits for the volume filling factors of these clouds are in good agreement with results obtained from optical observations. The long time-scales for the dispersion of the clouds (similar to 10(7) yr) are consistent with the apparently exclusive occurrence of the DDRG phenomenon in large (greater than or similar to 700 kpc) radio sources, and with the observed correlation of the strength of the optical/UV alignment effect in z similar to 1 FRII sources with their linear size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available