4.6 Article

Species-specific alternative splice mimicry at the growth hormone receptor locus revealed by the lineage of retroelements during primate evolution - A novel mechanism accounting for protein diversity between and within species

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 275, Issue 25, Pages 18664-18669

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M001615200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In humans, growth hormone receptor (GHR) transcripts exist in two isoforms differing by the retention (GHRfl) or exclusion (GHRd3) of exon 3, whereas in mice GHRfl is solely expressed. This species-specific expression pattern is believed to result from an alternative splice event that, on the basis of conflicting data obtained in humans, has been considered to be tissue-, developmentally, and/or individual-specific, To decipher the molecular basis of this unusual trait, we isolated a 6.8-kilobase fragment spanning exon 3 from individuals expressing GHRfl. Sequence analysis revealed the existence of two 99% identical retroelements flanking this exon, Unexpectedly, individuals expressing GHRd3 displayed a 2.7-kilobase deletion involving exon 3, which most likely results from an ancestral homologous recombination between the two retroelements, The lineage of these retroelements during primate evolution revealed the species specificity of the GHRd3 allele. These findings led us to propose a model underlying the existence of the sole GHRfl allele in most species, Such a retrovirus-mediated alternative splice mimicry, which clears up several as yet unexplained phenomena (i.e. the above-mentioned expression data, the Mendelian inheritance of GHR expression patterns, and the deletion of nonconsecutive exons in growth hormone resistant patients), represents a novel physiological mechanism accounting for protein diversity between and within species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available