4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with abdominal gunshot wounds

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00247-8

Keywords

abdominal gunshot wounds; mortality; morbidity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Risk factors that may independently predict mortality and morbidity in patients with abdominal gunshot wounds have not been fully elucidated. We prospectively studied the effects of 12 potential risk factors on mortality and morbidity in 82 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds who required laparotomy. Univariate analysis of these factors revealed that shock on admission, presence of penetrating colon injury and number of intra-abdominal organs injured (NOI) > 2 were associated with greater than threefold increased incidence of death (p < 0.05). Penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI) score > 15 was associated with twentyfold increased incidence of death (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that only PATI (P = 0.001), number of postoperative complications per patient (N-comp) (P = 0.023) and presence of shock on admission (P = 0.028) were independently significant in predicting mortality. PATI was the only risk factor that independently predicted the development of postoperative infectious complications and N-comp (P < 0.0001). The type of gun used was not a significant risk factor (P > 0.05). The 15 (18.3%) non-survivors were significantly older than survivors (P = 0.02), had longer operations (P = 0.004) and their NOI, PATI and N-comp were significantly higher (P < 0.001). The uniformly prolonged injury to surgery time in all patients contributed to the high incidence of infectious complications (62.2%) and mortality. PATI score was the most important factor found to be independently associated with mortality and morbidity in our subset of patients with prolonged injury to surgery time and high rate of colon injury. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available