4.7 Article

Analysis of muscle creatine kinase regulatory elements in recombinant adenoviral vectors

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 16-25

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/mthe.2000.0089

Keywords

adenovirus; muscle-specific; muscle creatine kinase; dendritic cell; muscular dystrophy

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR18860] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG15434] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adenoviral gene transfer holds promise for gene therapy, but effective transduction of id large and distributed tissue such as muscle will almost certainly require systemic delivery. In this context, the use of muscle-specific regulatory elements such as the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter and enhancer will avoid potentially harmful ectopic expression of transgenes. We describe here the development and testing of adenoviral vectors containing small, striated muscle-specific, highly active MCK expression cassettes. One of these regulatory elements (CK6) is less than 600 bp in length and is 12% as active as the CMV promoter/enhancer in muscle. A recombinant adenoviral vector containing this regulatory element retains very high muscle specificity, expressing 600-fold higher levels of transgene in muscle than in liver. Muscle-specific regulatory elements may also increase persistence of transduced muscle cells. Adenoviral transduction of dendritic cells has been shown to stimulate cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses directed against transgene epitopes. We show that human dendritic cells infected in vitro with MCK-containing adenoviruses do not express significant levels of transgene. Furthermore, while adenoviral vectors containing nonspecific promoters are normally cleared from muscle tissue within 1 month, we show that MCK-containing vectors express significant levels of transgene 4 months after intramuscular injection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available