4.7 Article

Earthworms (Eisenia foetida, Savigny) mucus as complexing ligand for imidacloprid

Journal

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 845-850

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-010-0494-4

Keywords

Earthworm; Mucus; Complexation; Fluorescence titration

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-335]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40872169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Earthworms can excrete copious amounts of mucus that may affect the fraction, transport fate, and bioavailability of contaminants in soil. However, interaction of mucus with organic contaminants is still not well-known. In the present study, complexation properties of surface mucus (from the earthworm species Eisenia foetida, Savigny) with imidacloprid were investigated using fluorescence excitation emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy. It was found that carbohydrates and proteins are major components in mucus of this species. Two fluorescent peaks belonging to protein-like substances were identified in the EEM spectrum of mucus. The protein-like fluorescence was clearly quenched by imidacloprid, indicating that the protein-like substances reacted strongly with imidacloprid. The fluorescence quenching processes was governed by a static process. The values of effective quenching constant (logK (a)) for these two peaks were 11.46 and 7.96, respectively, indicating that there is a strong interaction between mucus and imidacloprid and mucus-imidacloprid complexes are formed. Higher binding constants (logK (b) = 25.6 and 14.0) than those for heavy metals binding to dissolved organic matter or organic pollutants binding to proteins confirm the strong complexation between mucus and imidacloprid. Our study implies that earthworm surface mucus may significantly affect the fraction, toxicity, and bioavailability of organic contaminants in the soil due to its high affinity for organic contaminants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available