Journal
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 411-415Publisher
QUALITY MEDICAL PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80021-9
Keywords
achalasia; laparoscopy; myotomy; perforation; pneumatic dilation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Current management of esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilation for achalasia is thoracotomy and repair with myotomy. This study aims to assess the outcome of patients managed by laparotomy, and the role of laparoscopic repair. The study was carried out by means of retrospective case review and prospective follow-up with a symptom questionnaire. Results were compared with results in patients undergoing elective Heller myotomy Over a 20-year period, 445 dilations for achalasia were performed in 371 patients. There were 10 esophageal perforations, Nine patients were referred for surgery and were successfully managed with a transabdominal repair. Laparoscopic repair was attempted in four patients but was successful in only one because of the perforation site. After a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, grade 1 or 2 Visick scores were recorded in all patients. Residual symptoms of dysphagia occurred in 67% in the emergency group and 88% in the elective group. There was an increased incidence of heartburn compared to elective myotomy. Early operation after perforation provides good results for treatment of achalasia. Mild dysphagia persists and there is an increasing sensation of heartburn. The site of perforation is typically posterolateral, which makes laparoscopic repair difficult.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available