4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of dietary folate on DNA strand breaks within mutation-prone exons of the p53 gene in rat colon

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages 151-161

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2000.8518

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Diminished folate status has been observed to increase colorectal cancer risk. Folate plays an important role in DNA synthesis and repair. This study investigated the effects of dietary folate on DNA strand breaks in the p53 and Ape genes, and how these changes ave related to steady-state levels of the corresponding transcripts. Methods: Three groups of rats were fed diets containing 0, 2 (basal requirement), or 8 mg folate/kg for 5 weeks. At each weekly time point, plasma and colonic mucosal folate concentrations were determined. Site-specific DNA strand breaks were assessed by semiquantitative PCR. Steady-state levels of messenger RNA were measured by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Results: Dietary folate deficiency produced progressive DNA strand breaks within exons 5-8 of the p53 gene in rat colon (P < 0.02). Accumulation of strand breaks was not observed in other exons of the p53 gene, in the Ape and p-actin genes, or at the genomic level. Folate supplementation at 4 times the basal requirement significantly increased p53 integrity compared with the basal and deficient diets (P < 0,05). p53 integrity in exons 5-8 was significantly correlated with folate status (P < 0.03). Dietary folate deprivation progressively decreased, whereas supplementation increased, steady-state levels of p53 transcript over 5 weeks (P < 0.05). No such changes were observed for the Ape gene, Steady-state levels of p53 transcript were significantly correlated with folate status and p53 integrity in exons 5-8 (P < 0.002), Conclusions: These data provide a plausible mechanism by which folate deficiency promotes, and folate supplementation suppresses, colorectal carcinogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available