4.8 Article

Neuroprotection mediated by changes in the endothelial actin cytoskeleton

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 15-24

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI9639

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL052233, HL-26202, HL-52233] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [P01 NS010828, NS-10828, P50 NS010828, F32 NS010828] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cerebral blood flow is regulated by endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO), and endothelial NO synthase-deficient (eNOS-deficient; eNOS(-/-)) mice develop larger cerebral infarctions following middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. We report that disruption of Rho-mediated endothelial actin cytoskeleton leads to the upregulation of eNOS expression and reduces the severity of cerebral ischemia following MCA occlusion. Mice treated with the Rho inhibitor Clostridium botulinum C3 transferase (10 mu g/d) or the actin cytoskeleton disrupter cytochalasin D (1 mg/kg) showed a two- to fourfold increase in vascular eNOS expression and activity. This increase in eNOS expression was not due to increases in eNOS gene transcription, but to prolongation of eNOS mRNA half-life from 10 +/- 3 hours to 24 +/- 4 hours. Indeed, endothelial cells overexpressing a dominant-negative Rho mutant (N19RhoA) exhibited decreased actin stress fiber formation and increased eNOS expression. Inhibition of vascular Rho guano sine-5'-triphosphate binding activity by the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor simvastatin increased cerebral blood flow to ischemic regions of the brain, and mice treated with simvastatin, C3 transferase, or cytochalasin D showed smaller cerebral infarctions following MCA occlusion. No neuroprotection was observed with these agents in eNOS(-/-) mice. These findings suggest that therapies which target the endothelial actin cytoskeleton may have beneficial effects in ischemic stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available