4.3 Article

Roles of respiratory oxidases in protecting Escherichia coli K12 from oxidative stress

Publisher

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1002779201379

Keywords

oxidative stress; cytochromes bd and bo '; catalase expression

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isogenic strains of Escherichia coli that were defective in either of the two major aerobic terminal respiratory oxidases (cytochromes bo' and bd) or in the putative third oxidase (cytochrome bd-II) were studied to elucidate role(s) for oxidases in protecting cells from oxidative stress in the form of H2O2 and paraquat. Exponential phase cultures of all three oxidase mutants exhibited a greater decline in cell viability when exposed to H2O2 stress compared to the isogenic parent wild-type strain. Cytochrome bo' mutants showed the greatest sensitivity to H2O2 under all conditions studied indicating that this oxidase was crucial for protection from H2O2 in E. coli. Cell killing of all oxidase mutants by H2O2 was by an uncharacterized mechanism (mode 2 killing) with cell growth rate affected. The expression of Phi(katG-lacZ), an indicator of intracellular H2O2, was 2-fold higher in a cydAB::kan mutant compared to the wild-type strain at low H2O2 concentrations (< 100 mu M) suggesting that cytochrome bd mutants were experiencing higher intracellular levels of H2O2. Protein fusions to the three oxidase genes demonstrated that expression of genes encoding cytochrome bd, but not cytochrome bo' or cytochrome bd-II was increased in the presence of external H2O2. This increase in expression of Phi(cydA-lacZ) by H2O2 was further enhanced in a cyo::kan mutant. The level of cytochrome bd determined spectrally and Phi(cydA-lacZ) expression was 5-fold and 2-fold higher respectively in an rpoS mutant compared to isogenic wild-type cells suggesting that RpoS was a negative regulator of cytochrome bd. Whether the effect of RpoS is direct or indirect remains to be determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available