4.1 Article

Methods to select suitable fetal bovine serum for use in quality control assays for the detection of adventitious viruses from biological products

Journal

BIOLOGICALS
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 242-248

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.06.001

Keywords

Fetal bovine serum; Detection of adventitious virus; Biological products; Vaccines; Bovine viral diarrhea virus

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22780265] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Production of biological products, especially vaccines, usually requires materials derived from animals, and there are always risks that animal pathogens derived from these materials could contaminate the final products. Detection of adventitious agents is performed by quality control tests. In these biological assays, animal derived materials are also used and another problem arises, as fetal bovine serum (FBS) is used as an ingredient in tissue culture media. FBS contaminated with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) or other bovine pathogens, as well as antibodies against these pathogens may lead to false results in quality control assays. In this study, in order to determine the actual status of commercial FBS, we performed quality tests on various FBS samples. As a result, in 28 of 49 FBS samples (57.1%), pestivirus genes were detected by pan-pestivirus reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. Furthermore, two samples contained infectious BVDV. Neutralizing antibodies against BVDVs were detected in 48 of 49 samples (97.6%) by the virus neutralization test based on the serum-dilution or virus-dilution methods. Antibodies against other bovine pathogens were detected rarely in these samples. From our results, we recommend methods to select FBS that are focused on detection of BVDV and neutralizing antibodies against BVDV. (C) 2011 The International Alliance for Biologicals. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available