4.7 Article

Lithium increases N-acetyl-aspartate in the human brain:: In vivo evidence in support of bcl-2's neurotrophic effects?

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00252-3

Keywords

bcl-2; lithium; bipolar mood disorder; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; neuroprotection; N-acetyl-aspartate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent preclinical studies have shown that lithium (Li) robustly increases the levels of the major neuroprotective protein, bcl-2, in rat brain and in cells of human neuronal origin. These effects are accompanied by striking neuroprotective effects in vitro and in the rodent central nervous system in vivo. We have undertaken the present study to determine if lithium exerts neurotrophic/neuroprotective effects in the human brain in vivo. Methods: Using quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) levels (a putative marker of neuronal viability and function) were investigated longitudinally in 21 adult subjects (12 medication-free bipolar affective disorder patients and 9 healthy volunteers). Regional brain NAA levels were measured at baseline and following 4 weeks of lithium (administered in a blinded manner). Results: A significant increase in total brain NAA concentration was documented (p < .0217). NAA concentration increased in all brain regions investigated, including the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. Conclusions: This study demonstrates for the first time that Li administration at therapeutic doses increases brain. NAA concentration. These findings provide intriguing indirect support for the contention that chronic lithium increases neuronal viability/function in the human brain, and suggests that some of Li's long-term beneficial effects may be mediated by neurotrophic/neuroprotective events. (C) 2000 Society of Biological Psychiatry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available