4.1 Article

Chloroquine prophylaxis, iron-folic acid supplementation or case management of malaria attacks in primigravidae in western Uganda: effects on maternal parasitaemia and haemoglobin levels and on birthweight

Publisher

ROYAL SOC TROPICAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90125-1

Keywords

malaria; pregnancy; prophylaxis; chloroquine; iron supplementation; folic acid supplementation; parasitaemia; anaemia; birthweight; Uganda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of weekly chloroquine prophylaxis, daily iron-weekly folic acid supplementation or passive case management on maternal haemoglobin and parasitaemia and on birthweight were examined in primigravidae in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled intervention trial in 1996-98 in Hoima District, western Uganda. Iron-folic acid supplementation significantly increased mean birthweight as compared to case management (P = 0.03). Low birthweight (<2.5 kg) occurred in 2% of babies of women receiving chloroquine prophylaxis for greater than or equal to 8 weeks and in 9% in the case management group (RR = 0.36, 95 % CI 0.13-1.00 P = 0.009). Parasitaemia at enrolment significantly correlated with low birthweight in the case management group as compared to the intervention groups (P = 0.02). Women in the case management group who were parasitaemic and had haemoglobin levels <100 gn at delivery had babies with lower mean birthweight as compared to babies in the other groups (P = 0.04). Low haemoglobin level at enrolment, irrespective of parasitaemia status, was a predictor of low birthweight in the case management group only (P = 0.04). Chloroquine prophylaxis and iron-folic acid supplementation significantly increased maternal haemoglobin levels during pregnancy as compared to case management (P = 0.01 and 0.007, respectively) and the increase correlated to the duration of the intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available