4.5 Article

Role of Vanadium (V) in the Differentiation of C3H10t1/2 Cells Towards Osteoblast Lineage: A Comparative Analysis with Other Trace Elements

Journal

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
Volume 152, Issue 1, Pages 135-142

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-013-9602-2

Keywords

Trace element; Vanadium ion; Osteoblast; Differentiation; Toxicity

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [DBT-JRF/08-09/459]
  2. Ministry of Human Resource and Development [MHR03-412]
  3. Uttarakhand State Council for Science and Technology [UCS&T/R&D/LS-10/11-12/4224/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent time, vanadium compounds are being used as antidiabetic drug and in orthopedic implants. However, the exact role of this incorporated vanadium in improving the quality of bone structure and morphology is not known. The impact of vanadium ion was studied and compared to other trace metal ions with respect to the proliferation and osteoblast differentiation of C3H10t1/2 cells. Toxicity profile of these trace metal ions revealed a descending toxicity trend of Fe2+ > Zn2+ > Cu2+ > Co2+ > Mn2+ > V5+ > Cr2+. The effect of vanadium and other trace metal ions on osteoblast differentiation was evaluated by culturing the cells for 10 days in osteoblastic medium supplemented with different trace ions at concentrations lower than their cytotoxic doses. The results indicated that vanadium has maximum impact on the induction of osteoblast differentiation by upregulating alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralization by up to 145 and 150 %, respectively (p < 0.05), over control. Cu2+ and Zn2+ had a mild inhibitory effect, while Mn2+, Fe2+, and Co2+ demonstrated a clear decrease in osteoblast differentiation when compared to the control. The data as presented here demonstrate that orthopedic implants, if supplemented with trace metals like vanadium, may provide a source of better model for bone formation and its turnover.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available