3.8 Article

Is infection risk linked to exercise workload?

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages S406-S411

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200007001-00005

Keywords

upper respiratory tract infection; immunity; lymphocyte; neutrophil

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NIEMAN, D. C. Is infection risk linked to exercise workload? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 32, No. 7, Suppl.. pp. S406-S411, 2000. Anecdotal, survey, and epidemiological data suggest that endurance athletes are at an increased risk for upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) during periods of heavy training and the 1- to 2-wk period after race events. The majority of athletes, however, who participate in endurance race events do not experience illness. Of greater public health importance is the consistent findings of a reduction in URTI risk reported by fitness enthusiasts and athletes who engage in regular exercise training while avoiding overrenching/overtraining. Although it naturally follows that infection risk should in some way be linked to acute and chronic exercise-induced alterations in immunity, attempts thus far to measure this association have been unsuccessful. There is growing evidence that for several hours subsequent to heavy exertion, several components of both the innate and adaptive immune system exhibit suppressed function. The immune response to heavy exertion is transient however, and further research on the mechanisms underlying the immune response to prolonged and intensive endurance exercise is necessary before meaningful clinical applications can be drawn. Some attempts have been made through chemical or nutritional means (e.g., indomethacin, glutamine, vitamin C, and carbohydrate supplementation) to attenuate immune changes after intensive exercise to lower the risk of infection. No consistent relationship between nutritional interventions, exercise immunology, and alteration in URTI risk has yet been established.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available