4.6 Article

Sibling correlation of deficit syndrome in the Irish study of high-density schizophrenia families

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 157, Issue 7, Pages 1071-1076

Publisher

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.7.1071

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-40279, MH-41953, MH-45390] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The deficit syndrome is a subtype of schizophrenia characterized by primary and enduring negative features of psychopathology. It appears to reflect a distinct subtype within the syndrome of schizophrenia. Little is known about the familial or genetic aspects of the deficit syndrome. The purpose of this study was to determine whether deficit versus nondeficit subtypes are correlated in sibling pairs affected with schizophrenia. Method: The present study was based on the Irish Study of High-Density Schizophrenia Families. From the earlier study the authors selected a subset of patients who were members of sibling pairs in which both siblings had been diagnosed with core schizophrenia, which included schizophrenia, simple schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder with poor outcome. The Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome was used to make deficit versus nondeficit diagnoses, which were based on chart examinations by reviewers blind to sibling status. This method resulted in 65 patients being diagnosed with the deficit syndrome and 401 patients diagnosed as nondeficit (prevalence=13.9%). This group included 347 full sibling pairs, which were analyzed for resemblance with respect to deficit versus nondeficit subtype by means of logistic regression. Results: Deficit versus nondeficit subtypes were significantly correlated in sibling pairs concordant for core schizophrenia. Conclusions: Familial factors contribute significantly to whether a person has the deficit subtype of schizophrenia. This familial contribution could be genetic or environmental.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available