4.5 Article

Interaction Between Nanoparticulate Anatase TiO2 and Lactate Dehydrogenase

Journal

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
Volume 136, Issue 3, Pages 302-313

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-009-8548-x

Keywords

Nanoparticulate anatase TiO2; Lactate dehydrogenase; Interaction; Activity; Unfolding

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901218]
  2. Medical Development Foundation of Soochow University of China [EE120701]
  3. National Bringing New Ideas Foundation of Student of China [57315427, 57315927]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to study the mechanisms underlying the effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, EC1.1.1.27), Institute of Cancer Research region mice were injected with nanoparticulate anatase TiO2 (5 nm) of various doses into the abdominal cavity daily for 14 days. We then examined LDH activity in vivo and in vitro and direct evident for interaction between nanoparticulate anatase TiO2 and LDH using spectral methods. The results showed that nanoparticulate anatase TiO2 could significantly activate LDH in vivo and in vitro; the kinetics constant (Km) and Vmax were 0.006 mu M and 1,149 unit mg(-1) protein min(-1), respectively, at a low concentration of nanoparticulate anatase TiO2, and 3.45 and 0.031 mu M and 221 unit mg(-1) protein min(-1), respectively, at a high concentration of nanoparticulate anatase TiO2. By fluorescence spectral assays, the nanoparticulate anatase TiO2 was determined to be directly bound to LDH, and the binding constants of the binding site were 1.77 x 10(8) L mol(-1) and 2.15 x 10(7) L mol(-1), respectively, and the binding distance between nanoparticulate anatase TiO2 and the Trp residue of LDH was 4.18 nm, and nanoparticulate anatase TiO2 induced the protein unfolding. It was concluded that the binding of nanoparticulate anatase TiO2 altered LDH structure and function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available