4.6 Article

Internal and external tibial rotation strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 552-555

Publisher

AMER ORTHOPAEDIC SOC SPORT MED
DOI: 10.1177/03635465000280041801

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The internal and external tibial rotation torques of subjects who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts were measured to determine whether harvest of the tendons results in weakness of tibial internal and external rotation. Cybex NORM dynamometer examinations were performed to measure internal and external tibial torque at angular velocities of 60, 120, and 180 deg/sec in 23 subjects. The sex-specific average torque data of the reconstructed limbs were compared with those of the contralateral limbs. Relative internal and external torque scores were calculated for each subject by subtracting the peak torque of the reconstructed knee from that of the contralateral knee. These relative scores were averaged and compared with the null hypothesis that each score should be statistically similar to zero. Subjects were evaluated at an average of 51 +/- 40 months postoperatively. The mean relative internal torque scores of the reconstructed limbs showed a statistically significant decrease from those of the contralateral limbs at all angular velocities. The mean relative external torque scores of the reconstructed limbs were statistically similar to those of the contralateral limbs at all angular velocities. Subjects who had undergone ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons demonstrated internal tibial rotation weakness in their reconstructed knees compared with their contralateral knees at all angular velocities tested. These results suggest that semitendinosus and gracilis tendon harvest causes weakness of internal tibial rotation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available