4.6 Review

Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus

Journal

BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Volume 91, Issue 1, Pages 13-52

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12160

Keywords

acoustic communication; information; information theory; machine learning; Markov model; meaning; network analysis; sequence analysis; vocalisation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS)
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  4. U.S. Department of Agriculture through NSF Awards [EF-0832858, DBI-1300426]
  5. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  6. NSF [DEB-1119660, IOS-0842759]
  7. NIH [R01DC009582]
  8. ONR [N0001411IP20086]
  9. NOPP (ONR/BOEM) [N00014-11-1-0697]
  10. U.S. Office of Naval Research
  11. grant BASMATI from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [TIN2011-27479-C04-03]
  12. National Research Council postdoctoral fellowship
  13. CONACYT, Mexico [I010/214/2012]
  14. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K16112, 24700291] Funding Source: KAKEN
  15. Direct For Biological Sciences [GRANTS:13938558] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  16. Direct For Biological Sciences
  17. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1300426, GRANTS:13718161] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  18. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1125423] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  19. Division Of Environmental Biology [GRANTS:13938558] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  20. Division Of Environmental Biology
  21. Direct For Biological Sciences [1119660] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  22. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1125423] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal acoustic communication often takes the form of complex sequences, made up of multiple distinct acoustic units. Apart from the well-known example of birdsong, other animals such as insects, amphibians, and mammals (including bats, rodents, primates, and cetaceans) also generate complex acoustic sequences. Occasionally, such as with birdsong, the adaptive role of these sequences seems clear (e.g. mate attraction and territorial defence). More often however, researchers have only begun to characterise-let alone understand-the significance and meaning of acoustic sequences. Hypotheses abound, but there is little agreement as to how sequences should be defined and analysed. Our review aims to outline suitable methods for testing these hypotheses, and to describe the major limitations to our current and near-future knowledge on questions of acoustic sequences. This review and prospectus is the result of a collaborative effort between 43 scientists from the fields of animal behaviour, ecology and evolution, signal processing, machine learning, quantitative linguistics, and information theory, who gathered for a 2013 workshop entitled, 'Analysing vocal sequences in animals'. Our goal is to present not just a review of the state of the art, but to propose a methodological framework that summarises what we suggest are the best practices for research in this field, across taxa and across disciplines. We also provide a tutorial-style introduction to some of the most promising algorithmic approaches for analysing sequences. We divide our review into three sections: identifying the distinct units of an acoustic sequence, describing the different ways that information can be contained within a sequence, and analysing the structure of that sequence. Each of these sections is further subdivided to address the key questions and approaches in that area. We propose a uniform, systematic, and comprehensive approach to studying sequences, with the goal of clarifying research terms used in different fields, and facilitating collaboration and comparative studies. Allowing greater interdisciplinary collaboration will facilitate the investigation of many important questions in the evolution of communication and sociality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available