4.5 Article

The level of protein and type of fat in the diet of pregnant rats both affect lymphocyte function in the offspring

Journal

NUTRITION RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 995-1005

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0271-5317(00)00190-1

Keywords

lymphocyte proliferation; natural killer cell; programming; maternal diet; fat; protein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Female rats were fed throughout pregnancy on diets which differed in the level of protein (90 or 180 g/kg) and the type of fat (100 g corn oil or 50 g corn oil + 50 g coconut oil or 10 g corn oil + 90 g coconut oil/kg) they contained. At birth they were transferred to standard laboratory chow. Thymocytes from neonates exhibited a strong proliferative response to the T-cell mitogen concanavalin A, whereas spleen lymphocytes did not. Lower protein intake during pregnancy impaired neonatal thymocyte proliferation by up to 80%. Thymic and spleen lymphocyte proliferation remained impaired at weaning for the offspring of darns fed the lower protein diet containing 100 or 50 g corn oil/kg. Lymphocytes from the offspring of dams fed the lower protein diet containing 90 g coconut oil/kg responded in a similar fashion to cells from the offspring of dams fed the diets containing 180 g protein/kg. Thus, the acquisition of lymphocyte responsiveness which was impaired at birth after prenatal exposure to a low protein diet could be overcome postnatally if the prenatal diet included a large amount of coconut oil and a small amount of corn oil. Spleen natural killer cell activity at weaning was lower following prenatal exposure to the low protein diet and was lower when coconut oil was included in the diet. Thus, some aspects of immune function are programmed in utero by factors related to the diet of the mother. The effects of the nutrients and other factors received during suckling and of the developmental changes in the immune system which occur postpartum appear unable to overcome the impact of the diet received in utero. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available