4.7 Article

Management of cracked soils for water saving during land preparation for rice cultivation

Journal

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
Volume 56, Issue 1-2, Pages 105-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00125-2

Keywords

bypass flow; irrigation; shallow tillage; mulching; water-use efficiency

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High water loss Juring land preparation of soils For rice (Oryza sativa L.) production results. from bypass flow through cracks. It was hypothesized that the losses can be reduced by measures that minimize crack development during the soil drying period or impede the now of water through these cracks. The effect of straw mulching and shallow surface tillage on crack formation during the fellow period, and on water flow components during land preparation was investigated in field experiments on an Epiaqualf and a Pellustert in the Philippines. Cracks did not completely close upon rewetting, resulting in high loss (152-235 mm of water) during land preparation of the control (i.e. no soil management treatment) plots. Straw mulching helped conserve moisture in the soil profile, and reduced the mean crack width by 32% of the control. Mulching did not significantly reduce mean crack depth and the amount of water used in land preparation. Shallow tillage formed small soil aggregates which made the crack water now discontinuous and impeded groundwater recharge from the water flow through cracks, reduced total water input for land preparation by 31-34%, equivalent to about 120 mm of water. The average surface irrigation water flow advanced faster and less time was needed for land preparation in the shallow tillage plots compared to the control. Shallow tillage offers a practical means for improving water-use efficiency of irrigation systems. In rainfed areas, it may facilitate early crop establishment and, thus, reduce the risk of late-season drought. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available