4.7 Article

Caffeine blockade of the thermal antihyperalgesic effect of acute amitriptyline in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 399, Issue 2-3, Pages 131-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00336-8

Keywords

amitriptyline; caffeine; thermal hyperalgesia; neuropathic pain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, we sought to determine whether administration of caffeine, a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist, would affect the thermal antihyperalgesic efficacy of acute amitriptyline in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Rats were rendered neuropathic by unilateral tight ligation of the fifth and sixth lumbar spinal nerves, and tested for thermal hyperalgesia using a focused beam of light. Systemic administration of caffeine (1.5-7.5 mg/kg), at the same time as amitriptyline, blocked the thermal antihyperalgesic effect of 10 mg/kg amitriptyline. The greatest degree of block exerted by caffeine was observed with 3.75 mg/kg (100% block), a dose that had no observable intrinsic effect. Spinal administration of amitriptyline (60 mu g) exhibited a mild antihyperalgesic effect that was unaffected by pretreatment with intrathecal caffeine (100 mu g). Peripheral administration of amitriptyline into the neuropathic paw (under brief anesthesia) produced an antihyperalgesic effect at both 30 and 100 nmol, with a greater effect being observed at 100 nmol. Coadministration of caffeine (1500 nmol) partially antagonized the effects of both doses of amitriptyline. The results of this study suggest that the thermal antihyperalgesic effect of acute amitriptyline in this model may involve enhancement of an endogenous adenosine tone. This involvement is important in light of the widespread consumption of caffeine, which may potentially act to reduce the benefits of amitriptyline in the treatment of neuropathic pain. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available