4.7 Article

Role of the cytoplasmic segments of Sec61α in the ribosome-binding and translocation-promoting activities of the Sec61 complex

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 53-64

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.150.1.53

Keywords

endoplasmic reticulum; protein targeting; protein translocation; translocation structure; protein topology

Categories

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 35687] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Sec61 complex performs a dual function in protein translocation across the RER, serving as both the high affinity ribosome receptor and the translocation channel. To define regions of the Sec61 complex that are involved in ribosome binding and translocation promotion, ribosome-stripped microsomes were subjected to limited digestions using proteases with different cleavage specificities. Protein immunoblot analysis using antibodies specific for the NH2 and COOH terminus of Sec61 alpha was used to map the location of proteolysis cleavage sites. We observed a striking correlation between the loss of binding activity for nontranslating ribosomes and the digestion of the COOH-terminal tail or cytoplasmic loop 8 of Sec61 alpha. The proteolyzed microsomes were assayed for SRP-independent translocation activity to determine whether high affinity binding of the ribosome to the Sec61 complex is a prerequisite for nascent chain transport. Microsomes that do not bind nontranslating ribosomes at physiolagical ionic strength remain active in SRP-independent translocation, indicating that the ribosome binding and translocation promotion activities of the Sec61 complex do not strictly correlate. Translocation-promoting activity was most severely inhibited by cleavage of cytosolic loop 6, indicating that this segment is a critical determinant for this function of the Sec61 complex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available