4.6 Article

Caveolin-1 and-2 expression is differentially regulated in cultured keratinocytes and within the regenerating epidermis of cutaneous wounds

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 258, Issue 1, Pages 23-32

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/excr.2000.4904

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and its receptor are involved in various types of epithelial repair processes. To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms of KGF action in the healing skin mound, we searched for genes which are regulated by this factor in cultured keratinocytes. Using the PCR-select technology we constructed a subtractive cDNA library. One of the KGF-regulated genes that we identified was shown to encode caveolin-1, a major component of caveolar membranes. Caveolin-1 is involved in a nide variety of cellular processes, particularly in the regulation of various signal transduction pathways. Caveolin-1 mRNA levels increased in cultured keratinocytes after KGF treatment. By in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry we found a strong expression of caveolin-1 in the KGF-responsive basal keratinocytes of the epidermis and the hyperproliferative epithelium of the mound as well as in endothelial cells and in other cells of the granulation tissue. In 13-day wounds expression of caveolin-1 mRNA was restricted to the regenerated dermis, In addition to caveolin-1, the mRNA expression of caveolin-2, a second member of the caveolin family, was also induced in keratinocytes after stimulation with KGF but also with other growth factors and cytokines. In contrast to caveolin-1, caveolin-2 protein was expressed in all layers of the normal epidermis and in the suprabasal layers of the hyperproliferative wound epithelium. These results demonstrate a differential expression of caveolin-1 and -2 in proliferating versus differentiating keratinocytes. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available